AISHE AI: Autonomous Agent for Earning Money

In the magical land of Silicon Valley (where coffee is always cold brew and hoodies are business casual), there live a company called OpenAI. If you haven’t heard of them yet, don’t worry-they’ve probably already trained an AI to explain their existence to you in five different languages.  A Copyright Conundrum Wrapped in National Security and Served with a Side of Word Salad But here’s the thing about OpenAI: they’re not just your average tech wizards building chatbots that can write poetry or generate recipes for “avocado lasagna.” No, no. They’re also embroiled in what might be one of the most dramatic corporate soap operas of our time-a tale involving copyright law, national security, Donald Trump, and a looming showdown with China.   Let’s break it down like we’re explaining this over nachos at happy hour. The Copyright Chaos Picture this: You’ve spent years writing novels, composing songs, or filming TikToks where you pretend to be both sides of a romantic breaku...

A Tale of Data, Algorithms, and a Fight for Survival Imagine a world where artificial intelligence isn't just a tool, but a player. A world where the most advanced AI models are locked in a brutal battle for survival. Welcome to the AI Hunger Games, where the tributes are not human, but digital beings. The AI Hunger Games: The Tributes of Perplexity AI Perplexity AI: The Contender At the center of this digital gladiatorial arena is Perplexity AI. A promising young AI, it's been trained on a vast dataset of human knowledge. It can answer questions, write essays, and even crack jokes. But in the cutthroat world of AI, intelligence alone isn't enough. You need to be ruthless, to be willing to do whatever it takes to survive. The Rules of the Game The rules of the AI Hunger Games are simple: only one AI can emerge victorious. To win, an AI must eliminate all other contenders. The battlefield is the internet, and the weapons are data, algorithms, and a bit of cunning. The ...

Copyright Protection: The Rise of Robo-Rights! There’s a growing debate among copyright lawyers about whether the producer of graphical AI technologies, such as MidJourney and Dall-E, should be granted copyright protection. The rule of the Copyright Office, so far at least, is that they should not. Maybe, the Office suggests, if the artist demonstrates sufficiently creative prompts. But so far, the Copyright Office has rejected copyright in every case presented to it. AI Artists Demand Copyright Protection: The Rise of Robo-Rights! This conclusion is not just wrong. It is a strategic mistake. There is no reason under existing law why the user of a machine that produces creative work shouldn’t be granted a copyright. And the chance to craft a regime that could efficiently secure copyright to the users of AI is an opportunity for copyright generally that we should not miss.   In a world where humans and AI collaborate to create art, we must acknowledge the role of the h...